Dexamethasone Perioperative Coanalgesia in Lumbar Spine Fusion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: A 48-hour trial of dexamethasone coanalgesia became our standard practice in May 2008. This is our research Ethics Board-approved review of this experience to date with attention to perioperative narcotics use and pain scores for the first 48 hours after surgery as well as length of stay (LOS), wound healing complications, and infections in the first 6 months, compared with the historical precedent control cohort. METHODS: Surgical case logs identified cases of 1- and 2-level elective lumbar decompression and fusion surgery performed since protocol initiation (cases) and for a like period beforehand (controls). Minimum of 6 months follow-up (sufficient to identify acute and subacute wound healing problems and perioperative infections) information was required. Hospital, Pain Service, and office records were reviewed for the extraction of outcomes data. RESULTS: We identified 132 cases and 146 controls. In 41 additional cases records were deficient. Baseline characteristics were equivalent. Cases included 70 males (53%) and 62 females (47%) of mean age 54 years (range, 18-84 y). Seventy-five (57%) cases were narcotics dependant (mean of 79.5 mg-morphine-equivalent daily). Controls included 78 males (53%) and 68 females (47%) of mean age 55 years (range, 27-85 y). Eighty-nine (61%) controls were narcotics dependant (mean 101.2 mg-morphine-equivalents daily). Mean morphine-equivalents narcotic consumption for 48 hours after surgery was 262.9 mg in cases and 280.7 mg in controls. VAS pain scores at 48 hours after surgery averaged 4.4 and 6.9 during rest and activity in the cases, and 3.7 and 6.3 during rest and activity in the controls. LOS averaged 3.9 days in cases and 5.2 days in controls. Delayed wound healing and surgical site infections were not observed in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Systemic dexamethasone after 1- and 2-level lumbar fusion surgery demonstrated minimal impact on 48 hours perioperative narcotics use with no detriment to pain control, wound healing, or infections. LOS was shortened by 25%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".