MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2321368966 · doi:10.1097/iae.0000000000000780

ASSESSMENT OF THE SIGNIFICANCE OF CYSTIC CHANGES AFTER EPIRETINAL MEMBRANE SURGERY WITH INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE REMOVAL

2015· article· en· W2321368966 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRetina · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinal and Macular Surgery
Canadian institutionsColumbia College
FundersNational Eye Institute
KeywordsVitrectomyEpiretinal membranePars planaMedicineVisual acuityOphthalmologyInternal limiting membranePhacoemulsificationTriamcinolone acetonideMacular edemaSurgeryMacular hole

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Brief Purpose: To assess the prevalence and significance of cystic changes after internal limiting membrane peeling during epiretinal membrane surgery. Methods: A retrospective review was performed on 64 patients who underwent pars plana vitrectomy with membranectomy for idiopathic epiretinal membrane between January 2010 and January 2012 by a single physician. Pars plana vitrectomy alone (Group 1, n = 32) or in combination with phacoemulsification (Group 2, n = 32) was performed. Peeling of the epiretinal membrane was assisted by triamcinolone, and internal limiting membrane was peeled up to the vascular arcades with the aid of brilliant blue dye. Results: In Group 1, best-corrected visual acuity in logMAR (Snellen) improved from 0.53 ± 0.29 (20/68) at baseline to 0.23 ± 0.22 (20/34) at 6-month follow-up (P < 0.001). Two cases (6.3%) developed new cystic changes within the inner nuclear layer; however, there was no significant difference in best-corrected visual acuity at 6 months (P = 0.475). In Group 2, best-corrected visual acuity improved from 0.41 ± 0.17 (20/51) at baseline to 0.18 ± 0.15 (20/30) at 6 months (P < 0.001). Eight cases (25%) developed new inner nuclear layer cystic changes; however, there was no significant difference in best-corrected visual acuity at 6 months (P = 0.894). Conclusion: Development of new inner nuclear layer cystic changes after epiretinal membrane surgery may be a frequent finding, but in contrast to cystoid macular edema, it does not seem to affect visual recovery and should be observed. The combination of pars plana vitrectomy with cataract extraction may increase the risk of inner nuclear layer cystic changes. Cystic changes after epiretinal membrane surgery and inner limiting membrane peeling are frequently encountered. The combination of pars plana vitrectomy with cataract extraction may increase the risk of cystic changes in the inner retina. The authors evaluate the prevalence of these histoarchitectural retinal changes and their functional impact.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.102
Threshold uncertainty score0.479

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it