Reversible Double Oxidation and Protonation of the Non-Innocent Bridge in a Nickel(II) Salophen Complex
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Substitution on the aromatic bridge of a nickel(II) salophen complex with electron-donating dimethylamino substituents creates a ligand with three stable, easily and reversibly accessible oxidation states. The one-electron-oxidized product is characterized as a nickel(II) radical complex with the radical bore by the central substituted aromatic ring, in contrast to other nickel(II) salen or salophen complexes that oxidize on the phenolate moieties. The doubly oxidized product, a singlet species, is best described as having an iminobenzoquinone bridge with a vinylogous distribution of bond lengths between the dimethylamino substituents. Protonation of the dimethylamino substituents inhibits these redox processes on the time scale of cyclovoltammetry, but electrolysis and chemical oxidation are consistent with deprotonation occurring concomitantly with electron transfer to yield the mono- and dioxidized species described above.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".