MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2321427851 · doi:10.3354/meps10588

Pacific herring Clupea pallasii and wrack macrophytes subsidize semi-terrestrial detritivores

2013· article· en· W2321427851 on OpenAlexafffund
CH Fox, Rana W. El‐Sabaawi, PC Paquet, TE Reimchen

Bibliographic record

VenueMarine Ecology Progress Series · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicIsotope Analysis in Ecology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of VictoriaRaincoast Conservation Foundation
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaRaincoast Conservation Foundation
KeywordsClupeaPacific herringHerringEcologyDetritivoreSupralittoral zoneFisheryBiologyEcosystemOceanographyIntertidal zoneGeographyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

MEPS Marine Ecology Progress Series Contact the journal Facebook Twitter RSS Mailing List Subscribe to our mailing list via Mailchimp HomeLatest VolumeAbout the JournalEditorsTheme Sections MEPS 495:49-64 (2014) - DOI: https://doi.org/10.3354/meps10588 Pacific herring Clupea pallasii and wrack macrophytes subsidize semi-terrestrial detritivores Caroline H. Fox1,2*, Rana El-Sabaawi1, Paul C. Paquet2,3, Thomas E. Reimchen1 1Department of Biology, and 3Department of Geography, University of Victoria, PO Box 3020, Station CSC, Victoria, British Columbia V8W 3N5, Canada 2Raincoast Conservation Foundation, PO Box 2429, Sidney, British Columbia V8L 3Y3, Canada *Corresponding author: caroline@raincoast.org ABSTRACT: The bi-directional movements of materials, nutrients and energy across the land-sea interface result in a number of ecological consequences. Migratory animals that move across ecosystems drive a number of these spatial subsidies (e.g. anadromous salmon), but many of the world's animal migrations are in decline. The cross-ecosystem reach of Pacific herring Clupea pallasii, a migratory, iteroparous forage fish that spawns along the coastlines of the North Pacific Ocean, has never been studied. Spawn events represent large aggregations of biomass and energy, a portion of which is transferred to intertidal and supratidal zones. Using fatty acids and stable isotopic signatures of carbon and nitrogen, we (1) traced the sources of production and (2) tested the hypothesis that herring subsidizes detritivorous, semi-terrestrial amphipods (Talitridae: Traskorchestia spp.), which are often abundant in intertidal and supratidal zones. Amphipods and likely dietary items (macrophytes and herring eggs) were collected from 5 beaches before and after herring spawned in Quatsino Sound, British Columbia. Combined with the use of mixing models, stable isotopes suggest that herring, in addition to brown algae and seagrass, were major sources of production during the study period. Fatty acid results suggest that brown algae is generally a major dietary resource for amphipods, but herring eggs provide important omega-3 fatty acids that are low in abundance prior to herring spawn events. Taken together, we provide corroborative evidence of a previously unknown cross-ecosystem spatial subsidy by Pacific herring. Further, because amphipods are prey for several terrestrial consumers, we also identify previously unknown marine-terrestrial linkages. KEY WORDS: Pacific herring · Spatial subsidy · Wrack · Amphipoda · Detritivores · Fatty acids · Stable isotope Full text in pdf format PreviousNextCite this article as: Fox CH, El-Sabaawi R, Paquet PC, Reimchen TE (2014) Pacific herring Clupea pallasii and wrack macrophytes subsidize semi-terrestrial detritivores. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 495:49-64. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps10588 Export citation RSS - Facebook - Tweet - linkedIn Cited by Published in MEPS Vol. 495. Online publication date: January 09, 2014 Print ISSN: 0171-8630; Online ISSN: 1616-1599 Copyright © 2014 Inter-Research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.082
Threshold uncertainty score0.162

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMarine Ecology Progress SeriesSame topicIsotope Analysis in EcologyFrench-language works237,207