Shifting the Energy Landscape of Multicomponent Reactions Using Aziridine Aldehyde Dimers: A Mechanistic Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A multicomponent reaction between an aziridine aldehyde dimer, isocyanide, and l-proline to afford a chiral piperazinone was studied to gain insight into the stereodetermining and rate-limiting steps of the reaction. The stereochemistry of the reaction was found to be determined by isocyanide addition, while the rate-limiting step was found to deviate from traditional isocyanide-based multicomponent reactions. A first-order rate dependence on aziridine aldehyde dimer and a zero-order rate dependence on all other reagents have been obtained. Computations at the MPWPW91/6-31G(d) level supported the experimental kinetic results and provide insight into the overall mechanism and the factors contributing to stereochemical induction. These factors are similar to traditional isocyanide-based multicomponent reactions, such as the Ugi reaction. The computations revealed that selective formation of a Z-iminium ion plays a key role in controlling the stereoselectivity of isocyanide addition, and the carboxylate group of l-proline mediates stereofacial addition. These conclusions are expected to be applicable to a wide range of reported stereoselective Ugi reactions and provide a basis for understanding the related macrocyclization of peptides with aziridine aldehydes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".