MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2321473037 · doi:10.1021/ef502616v

Addition Reactions of Olefins to Asphaltene Model Compounds

2015· article· en· W2321473037 on OpenAlexaff
Samuel D. Cardozo, Matthias Schulze, Rik R. Tykwinski, Murray R. Gray

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy & Fuels · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPetroleum Processing and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryOlefin fiberAlkylMass spectrometryAsphalteneOrganic chemistryChromatographyCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Addition reactions have been proposed as a significant pathway for coke formation in the liquid-phase cracking of heavy oils and bitumens. In order to study the kinetics of olefin addition in the liquid phase, two alkyl-bridged aromatic compounds, with molecular weights of 899.70 g/mol and 1127.99 g/mol, were thermally cracked with 1-hexadecene, 1-octadecene, or trans -stilbene, in a batch microreactor at 375–430 °C for 15 to 45 min. Reaction products were analyzed by gas chromatography, high-performance liquid chromatography, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry (MALDI-MS), and proton nuclear magnetic resonance ( 1 H NMR) spectroscopy. Kinetic data indicate a first-order reaction in model compound concentration, with energetics consistent with a free-radical chain mechanism. Tandem MS/MS and 1 H NMR spectra of the products are consistent with olefin addition through the alkyl bridge of the bridged aromatics. The results imply that (i) the addition products are able to abstract hydrogen to give detectable products faster than they decompose, and (ii) the addition products can react even more readily than the parent compounds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.412
Threshold uncertainty score0.410

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy & FuelsSame topicPetroleum Processing and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207