MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2321473418 · doi:10.1097/brs.0b013e3181f3d2df

Is Platelet-Derived Growth Factor-BB Expression Proportional to Fibrosis in the Hypertrophied Lumber Ligamentum Flavum?

2010· article· en· W2321473418 on OpenAlexaff
Yu Zhang, Jianting Chen, Zhaoming Zhong, Dehong Yang, Qingàn Zhu

Bibliographic record

VenueSpine · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineFibrosisPlatelet-derived growth factor receptorPlatelet-derived growth factorGrowth factorImmunohistochemistryPathologyLumbar spinal stenosisLumbarInternal medicineAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

STUDY DESIGN: A clinical and experimental assessment using human samples of lumbar ligamentum flavum (LF). OBJECTIVE: To identify platelet-derived growth factor-BB (PDGF-BB) expression in hypertrophied LF of patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSS) and relate it to fibrosis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Recent studies showed that fibrosis in LF hypertrophy was due to accumulation of inflammation-related scar tissue. PDGF-BB participates in scar formation and collagen development in wound healing and fibrosis diseases. However, it is unclear whether PDGF-BB expression is associated with fibrosis of the hypertrophied LF in LSS. METHODS: In all, 10 patients of LSS was enrolled in this study, while 10 patients of lumbar disc herniation (LDH) as a control group. LF thickness was measured by axial T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Fibrosis was graded and type of collagen was identified. The location and the expression of PDGF-BB were analyzed using immunohistochemical stains, real-time polymerase chain reaction, and Western Blotting. Correlation among LF thickness, fibrosis, and PDGF-BB expression was analyzed. RESULTS: LF thickness was 5.3 ± 1.0 mm (range from 3.9 to 7.5 mm) in the LSS group and 2.8 ± 0.7 mm (range from 1.69 to 3.8 mm) in the LDH group. Obvious fibrosis was observed in all samples of the LSS group, and correlated to LF thickness of the dural, middle, and dorsal layers (P < 0.05), respectively. PDGF-BB was detected in the hypertrophied LF, particularly in the dorsal layer. PDGF-BB expression was higher in the LSS group than that in the LDH group (P < 0.05), and in the dorsal layer than the dural layer in the LSS group (P < 0.05). PDGF-BB mRNA correlated significantly to thickness of LF (r = 0.41) and the severity of fibrosis (r = 0.69) (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: A higher PDGF-BB expression existed in the hypertrophied LF of patients with LSS and could be a risk factor of the fibrosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations46
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSpineSame topicSpine and Intervertebral Disc PathologyFrench-language works237,207