MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2321513248 · doi:10.3167/jrs.2014.140103

Translating Marina Carr for a Brazilian audience: The interweaving of memories in theatre and translation

2014· article· en· W2321513248 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Alinne Balduino Pires Fernandes

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Romance Studies · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTranslation Studies and Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsCarrTranslation (biology)ArtVisual artsCommunicationHistorySociologyBiologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, I wish to demonstrate how the theatre translator, when tailoring his/her translation to suit a particular theatre audience, resorts to creative strategies so as to establish dialogues between the exporting and importing cultures s/he is dealing with. Based on both my own translation of By the Bog of Cats… (1998), written by contemporary Irish playwright Marina Carr, and fieldwork carried out with a group of acting students in Florianopolis, Brazil (June 2010), this article shows how the Irish play, when translated into Brazilian Portuguese, creates layers of intertextuality with Brazilian–Azorean folklore and Brazilian theatre tradition, most particularly with Nelson Rodrigues’s modern play Vestido de noiva [The Wedding Dress]. The local language of southern Brazil set in the mystically unsettling space of a bog invited the actors, the director, and the audience members to embark on a hybrid voyage to both familiar and foreign places.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.618
Threshold uncertainty score0.228

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Romance StudiesSame topicTranslation Studies and PracticesFrench-language works237,207