Does Tension-Free Vaginal Tape Placement at the Time of Total Prolift Colpopexy Affect Distal Anterior Vaginal Support?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: : Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence often require concomitant procedures to treat both conditions. The purpose of this study was to determine whether tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) at the time of total Prolift colpopexy (TPC) affected distal anterior vaginal wall support. METHODS: : This was a retrospective cohort study of women that had TPC (n = 62) between January 2005 and December 2007. All patients had no uterus and underwent TPC with mesh placement in the anterior and posterior vaginal compartments. A concomitant TVT was placed only in those who had a preoperative diagnosis of urodynamic stress urinary incontinence with prolapse reduction. Patients were subdivided into those with (n = 26) and without TVT (n = 36). Data were compared between groups using Student t, Wilcoxon rank sum, and Fisher exact tests (P ≤ 0.05). RESULTS: : There were no significant differences between groups for all preoperative variables. Patients were observed for 6 to 12 months after TPC. Postoperatively, those with and without TVT had similar anterior POP quantification measurements (points Aa and Ba; P > 0.05), although the group with TVT had significantly more patients with anterior stage 2 and 3 recurrences (23%) when compared with the group without TVT (5%, P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: : Tension-free vaginal tape does not provide additional distal anterior vaginal wall support for patients undergoing TPC.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".