MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

P2-S2.21 Traditional devadasi system under transition: boon or bane for HIV prevention programme?

2011· article· en· W2321538152 on OpenAlexaff
Kaveri Gurav, Elizabeth Cooper, J Junno, Derek R. Stein, Dhanunjaya Rao Chintada, Mahesh Doddamane, Stephen Moses

Bibliographic record

VenueSexually Transmitted Infections · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHIV/AIDS Impact and Responses
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Family medicineVirology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background One of the key factors attributed to high prevalence of HIV in Northern Karnataka (in India) is socially accepted and widely practiced sex work. Girls from “Devadasi” community enter into sex work through socially accepted way of being dedicated to deity “Yellamma”. Currently, the “Devadasi” system is under transition where, new dedications are not accepted by community leaders. As a result, the social organization of traditional sex work is changing. Methods An exploratory research was undertaken in the district of Bagalkot, Karnataka. Ethnographic methods, including participant observation and Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) were used. FGDs were conducted with leaders, sex workers, peer educators, adolescent girls from “Devadasi” community and HIV service providers. Results “Daiva” is a committee consisting of key leaders from “Devadasi” community. “Daiva” functions at the local (village) level and make decisions for the welfare of their community. The death of many young “Devadasi” sex workers due to AIDS was reported as a key factor for “Daiva” in stopping girls from entering sex work. Towards this end, “Daiva” has declared that the families who dedicate their daughters will be fined (RS 5000 to 20 000) and be outcasted. Although there seem to be a consensus to the decision of “Daiva”, there are families who still want their daughters to start sex work. The fear of social and financial reprimand is placing new sex workers and their families in a marginalised and potentially illegal position within their village. Meanwhile, it is making new “Devadasi”? sex workers, conceal their identity and also avoid the HIV prevention services offered by peer educators of their own community at the door step. Conclusion Changing social organization and conditions of “Devadasi” sex workers increases their intrinsic risk and vulnerability to HIV. Therefore it is important to address the structural changes occurring within the “Devadasi” community and also create an environment for new sex workers to freely access HIV prevention and care services. An innovative intervention model that could negotiate between objectives of “Daiva” and needs of sex workers is required.“

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.849
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.097
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.162 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSexually Transmitted InfectionsSame topicHIV/AIDS Impact and ResponsesFrench-language works237,207