MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2321633520 · doi:10.3749/canmin.52.1.1

SERENDIBITE, A COMPLEX BOROSILICATE MINERAL FROM PONTIAC, QUEBEC: DESCRIPTION, CHEMICAL COMPOSITION, AND CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC DATA

2014· article· en· W2321633520 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Mineralogist · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCrystal Structures and Properties
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBorosilicate glassMineralGeologyMineralogyChemical compositionGeochemistryCrystallographyMaterials scienceChemistryMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Serendibite has been recently discovered in the Portage-du-Fort area, Pontiac Regional County Municipality, Quebec. Dark blue, often polysynthetic twinned on {011} and with no cleavage, serendibite crystals occur exclusively in a calc-silicate rock. Fine-grained anhedral serendibite, sometimes poikiloblastic, occurs with aluminous diopside. Less commonly, serendibite may form decussate masses in the same rock type. Serendibite is biaxial negative, with indices of refraction α 1.685(2), β 1.700(2), and γ 1.712(2); 2 V meas. = 93.6(4)°, 2 V calc. = 91°. Orientation matrix is X ^ c = +20.5°, Y ^ b = −42.6°, and Z ^ a = −24.6°. Dispersion is strong, r with cell parameters refined from an X-ray powder-diffraction pattern: a 10.035(2), b 10.423(3), c 8.648 (2) A, α 106.47(3)°, β 95.91(2)°, γ 124.46(2)°, V 674.3(2) A3. The seven strongest lines of the X-ray powder diffraction pattern [ d in A( I )( hkl )] are: 3.328(45)( ![Formula][2] 230), 3.029 (96)(012, 021, ![Formula][3] ![Formula][4] 2), 2.854(96)(0 ![Formula][5] 3, 0 ![Formula][6] 1, 120), 2.689(29)(3 ![Formula][7] 1), 2.604(95)(030), 2.469(100)( ![Formula][8] ![Formula][9] 3, 0 ![Formula][10] 3), and 2.357(28)(2 ![Formula][11] 3, 23 ![Formula][12] ). The crystal structure determination refined to R = 2.1% for 3877 unique reflections. The borosilicate structure, a member of the aenigmatite-rhonite group, is composed of layers parallel to (011). Layers of tetrahedral chains cross-linked by octahedral polyhedra alternate with layers of octahedral chains cross-linked by square antiprism polyhedral sheets. Tetrahedral and octahedral polyhedra are partially ordered and site assignments were determined. All cation sites are disordered to some degree. [1]: /embed/mml-math-1.gif [2]: /embed/mml-math-2.gif [3]: /embed/mml-math-3.gif [4]: /embed/mml-math-4.gif [5]: /embed/mml-math-5.gif [6]: /embed/mml-math-6.gif [7]: /embed/mml-math-7.gif [8]: /embed/mml-math-8.gif [9]: /embed/mml-math-9.gif [10]: /embed/mml-math-10.gif [11]: /embed/mml-math-11.gif [12]: /embed/mml-math-12.gif

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.943
Threshold uncertainty score0.574

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it