MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract 18405: Warfarin Dose Requirements and Polymorphisms in MicroRNA and Nuclear Receptor Genes

2015· article· en· W2321651248 on OpenAlexaffabout
Payman Shahabi, Félix Lamothe, Stéphanie Dumas, Géraldine Asselin, Louis‐Philippe Lemieux Perreault, Sylvie Provost, Yassamin Feroz Zada, Sylvie Perreault, Marie‐Pierre Dubé

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalMontreal Heart Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVitamin K epoxide reductaseVKORC1Single-nucleotide polymorphismWarfarinGeneGeneticsMedicineCYP2C9BiologyComputational biologyPharmacologyBioinformaticsInternal medicineAtrial fibrillationGenotype

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and Aim: The marked inter-individual variability in warfarin dose requirement is mainly attributed to the variants of the main target genes across the warfarin pharmacological pathway, i.e. cytochrome P-450 (CYP) 2C9, CYP3A4, ABCB1, vitamin K epoxide reductase complex subunit 1 (VKORC1) and epoxide hydrolase 1 (EPHX1). The expression of these genes is primarily regulated by a complex network of nuclear receptors (NR) which are encoded, in turn, by polymorphic genes. Furthermore, microRNAs (miRNA) can reduce the expression of both warfarin target genes and the genes encoding NRs. We investigated whether the variants of genes encoding i) warfarin targets, ii) NRs involved in the regulation of the targets and iii) miRNA involved in the regulation of NRs and the targets, are associated with warfarin dose requirements. Methods and Results: The study was performed using the Quebec Warfarin Cohort consisting of 988 new warfarin users who were recruited over a period of 3 years and were followed-up for 12 months. The candidate genes were selected according to the literature and included 5 warfarin target genes, 9 NRs genes and 29 miRNA genes. SNPs with MAF>0.01 within these genes were selected for the present study from the NCBI database. Genotyping was previously performed using Omni 2.5 array (Illumina, CA) and iPLEX ADME CYP2C9/VKORC1 panel (Agena, CA) and missing SNPs were imputed. We tested the effect of SNPs on the log-transformed values of dose at 3-month post-initiation using multivariate linear regression analysis, and the adjusted significance threshold was set to 2.49 x 10-4. A total of 3970 SNPs, including 702 in target genes, 3162 in NRs and 106 in miRNA genes were studied. For the association with warfarin dose, 137 SNPs in CYP2C9 and VKORC1 were significant, as well as 3 SNPs in nuclear vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene: rs4760658, β = -0,0852, P = 7,32x10-5; rs11168293, β = -0,0809, P = 1,78x10-4; rs4760655, β = -0,0799, P = 2,15x10-4. None of the variants in miRNA genes showed a significant association with warfarin dose. Conclusions: Variants in the gene encoding VDR, a nuclear receptor which has been previously shown to be involved in the regulation of CYP2C9, CYP3A4 and ABCB1, may contribute to the variability in response to warfarin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.069
Threshold uncertainty score0.137

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculationSame topicEicosanoids and Hypertension PharmacologyFrench-language works237,207