Abstract LB-109: BCR-ABL1 kinase activity but not its expression is dispensable for Ph+ quiescent stem cell survival which depends on the PP2A-controlled Jak2 activation and is sensitive to FTY720 treatment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background: The success of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) depends on the addiction of Philadelphia-positive (Ph+) CML progenitors to BCR-ABL1 kinase activity. However, CML quiescent hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) are TKI-resistant and represent an active disease reservoir. We hypothesize that this innate drug-resistance depends on inhibition of the tumor suppressor protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A). PP2A can be reactivated by FTY720, a drug that targets CML but not normal progenitors. Here we investigated the mechanism controlling survival/self-renewal of quiescent leukemic HSCs and their sensitivity to PP2A-activating drugs. Methods: HSCs from CML (n=68) and healthy (n=12) donors were FACS-isolated, and the biologic importance of PP2A inhibition and pharmacologic PP2A activation on their survival/self-renewal was assessed by BM serial transplantation; CFSE and Annexin-V staining; LTC-IC and CFC/replating assays; lentiviral shRNA/cDNA-transduction; LEF/TCF and proximity-ligation assays; Western blot, confocal microscopy and FACS analyses. Results: We observed increased BCR-ABL1 expression with impaired kinase activity in quiescent CML HSCs, in which BCR-ABL1 per se is required for induction of JAK2 that subsequently activated β-catenin and inhibited PP2A. In fact, PP2A was suppressed in CML but not normal CD34+/CD38−/CD90+ HSCs. FTY720 and/or its non-immunosuppressive (S)-FTY720-OMe derivative markedly reduced survival and self-renewal of CML but not normal quiescent HSCs through BCR-ABL1 kinase-independent and PP2A-mediated JAK2 and β-catenin inhibition. Importantly, FTY720 also strongly diminished BCR-ABL1+ LT-HSC frequency in serial BM transplantation assays. Conclusions: The pharmacologic targeting of the newly-identified BCR-ABL1 kinase-independent JAK2/β-catenin interplay in quiescent HSCs with FTY720 and its derivatives, might lead to cessation of lifelong patient dependence on TKIs. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-109. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-LB-109
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".