MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2321693157 · doi:10.1097/mnm.0000000000000255

The early plasma concentration of 51Cr-EDTA in patients with cirrhosis and ascites

2015· article· en· W2321693157 on OpenAlexaff
Surajith N. Wanasundara, Michal J. Wesolowski, R. C. Puetter, Maria Burniston, Elias Xirouchakis, Ioannis G. Giamalis, Paul Babyn, Carl A. Wesolowski

Bibliographic record

VenueNuclear Medicine Communications · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
Canadian institutionsRoyal University HospitalUniversity of SaskatchewanMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExponential functionCirrhosisAscitesInterquartile rangePower functionMathematicsBolus (digestion)Exponential decayMedicineInternal medicineStatisticsChemistryPhysicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to determine which of three two-parameter fitting functions (exponential, linear-log, and negative-power function of time) most accurately models early chromium-51-EDTA (51Cr-EDTA) plasma concentration data prior to 120 min in patients with cirrhosis and ascites and understand how these fitting functions affect the calculation of the area under the plasma concentration curve (AUC). METHODS: A bolus, antecubital intravenous injection of 2.6 MBq of 51Cr-EDTA was given to 13 patients with cirrhosis and ascites. Up to 16 blood samples were drawn at time points ranging from 5 to 1440 min following injection. The concentration data prior to 120 min were used as reference data. Early time concentration values, estimated by fitting exponential, linear-log, and negative-power functions of time to the time samples at 120, 180, and 240 min, were then compared with reference data. The AUC was calculated for each patient using the exponential, Bröchner-Mortensen-corrected exponential, and linear-log functions, and these values were compared. RESULTS: The withheld, observed plasma concentrations were (a) most accurately estimated by linear-log functions (Wilcoxon P=0.4548), (b) significantly underestimated by exponential functions (Wilcoxon P=0.0002), and (c) significantly overestimated by negative-power functions (Wilcoxon P=0.0034). The relative errors when ranked from best to worst were those for the linear-log (12.0%, 9.0%), exponential (22.9%, 14.2%), and negative-power (31.9%, 48.4%) functions of time, respectively (median, interquartile range). For each patient, the values for AUC calculated by the exponential function differed significantly (range=3.4-15.3%, median=8.3%) from those calculated by the corrected Bröchner-Mortensen exponential, as to a lesser extent did those values calculated using linear-log functions (range=0.4-8.0%, median=3.0%). CONCLUSION: In patients with cirrhosis, linear-log functions were significantly more accurate than exponential or power functions in estimating early time plasma concentrations (<120 min). However, the improved linear-log early time plasma concentration model does not provide as much correction to the total AUC as does the corrected Bröchner-Mortensen exponential method. This is likely because of the large contribution of late time data to the AUC, and future work is suggested to explore the late time fit problem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.213

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNuclear Medicine CommunicationsSame topicGallbladder and Bile Duct DisordersFrench-language works237,207