MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2321766629 · doi:10.2514/6.2011-6871

The Effect of a Buoyancy Gradient on the Longitudinal Flight Dynamics of a Superpressure Airship

2011· article· en· W2321766629 on OpenAlexaff
G. S. Schmidt

Bibliographic record

Venue11th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations (ATIO) Conference · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAerospace Engineering and Energy Systems
Canadian institutionsLockheed Martin (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBuoyancyDynamics (music)Flight dynamicsAerospace engineeringAeronauticsMechanicsEnvironmental scienceMeteorologyComputer sciencePhysicsEngineeringAerodynamicsAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Some stratospheric airships have been designed to operate routinely above their pressure height. These superpressure airships are intended to fly at altitudes of 60,000 ft MSL or even higher. One outcome of operating above pressure height is that an airship's weight remains approximately constant while its buoyancy varies with altitude. This effect has not been included in the linearized longitudinal equations of motion that have been applied to airships. In this paper, linearized equations governing the two-degree-offreedom longitudinal motion of a superpressure airship are derived. These equations contain additional terms that involve the rate of change of airship buoyancy with altitude. The characteristic equation of the airship’s motion is also provided. Due to the additional buoyancy terms, the degree of the characteristic equation increased from 3 to 4. This means that the airship’s motion changed from 1 nonoscillatory mode and 1 oscillatory mode to a more complicated motion. As an example, the roots of the characteristic equation are determined as a function of airspeed for the High Altitude Superpressure Powered Aerostat (HASPA) which was designed, constructed, and tested during the 1970s. Predicted time histories of the airship's vertical displacement, angle of attack, pitch angle, and pitch rate are also presented. At low airspeeds, the airship’s motion consisted of 2 oscillatory modes. At higher airspeeds, the motion changed to 2 nonoscillatory modes and 1 oscillatory mode. At all airspeeds, one of the oscillatory modes was nearly identical to the pendulum mode that occurs when the buoyancy gradient is not included. At 63% of the airship’s maximum airspeed, one of the nonoscillatory modes became unstable. A formula is derived that can be used to estimate the airspeed at which a superpressure airship will become longitudinally unstable. Also, a controls-fixed longitudinal stability criterion is developed for superpressure airships.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue11th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations (ATIO) ConferenceSame topicAerospace Engineering and Energy SystemsFrench-language works237,207