MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Smoking-induced preconditioning: acute, but not chronic, smoking paradoxically protects the endothelium from ischemia and reperfusion

2013· article· en· W2321910416 on OpenAlexaff
Tommaso Gori, Matteo Lisi, Saverio Dragoni, M.C. Leone, S Forconi, Thomas Münzel, John D. Parker

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health NetworkMount Sinai Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineIschemiaMyocardial infarctionCardiologyInternal medicinePlaceboEndotheliumEndothelial dysfunctionIschemic preconditioningBlood pressureInfarctionAnesthesiaPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: We set out to investigate whether the oxidative stress associated with acute, short-term exposure to cigarette smoking could induce a paradoxical protection similar to the phenomenon known as ischemic preconditioning. Background: Cigarette smoking is a well-accepted risk factor for myocardial infarction, stroke, and mortality. Paradoxically, however, several large epidemiological studies reported that, among patients who experience a myocardial infarction, those who smoke have lower mortality and morbidity. Methods and results: Radial artery endothelium-dependent Flow-Mediated Dilation (FMD) was measured in 10 healthy non-smoker subjects (7 males, 25-28 years old) before and after local ischemia/reperfusion (15 minutes ischemia followed by 15' reperfusion). Subjects underwent, in randomized order, two protocols: in the first, they smoked two cigarettes 15' after receiving 2 grams of intravenous vitamin C. In the second, they smoked two cigarettes 15' after receiving an intravenous placebo. A separate group of 10 light smokers (7 males, age 24-28 years, 3-10 cigarettes/day) underwent the same protocol after a 24-hour non-smoking interval. There were no differences among groups in resting arterial diameter, blood pressure, heart rate, blood flow before each FMD measurement (P>0.5 for both). After smoking + normal saline, FMD was not impaired by ischemia/reperfusion (P=0.3). In contrast, in those who smoked two cigarettes and received 2gr. i.v. vitamin C, this paradoxical protective effect of smoking was lost, and FMD after ischemia/reperfusion was significantly blunted as compared to the baseline FMD (P=0.008). Smoking did not induce any preconditioning-like effect in those who smoked 2-4 cigarettes per day for a week, and ischemia/reperfusion was associated with a significant blunting in FMD (P=0.005). Discussion: Beyond their role in the pathophysiology of atherosclerosis and endothelial dysfunction, reactive oxygen species are also important agents of cellular signal transduction, and their importance in the phenomenon called ischemic preconditioning has been demonstrated in animal and human studies. In certain situations, short oxidative bursts might paradoxically be associated with protective phenomena. Importantly, this protection appears to be lost in the setting of chronic (light) smoking.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Heart JournalSame topicCardiac Ischemia and ReperfusionFrench-language works237,207