Structure and Bonding of KSiH<sub>3</sub>and Its 18-Crown-6 Derivatives: Unusual Ambidentate Behavior of the SiH<sub>3</sub><sup>–</sup>Anion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Density functional theory (DFT) calculations of [K(18-crown-6)SiH(3)] (1) and KSiH(3) (2) have shown that both the classical tet and non-classical inv coordination modes of the [SiH(3)](-) anion to the K(+) ion are energetically accessible. Single-crystal X-ray structures of the tet and inv derivatives [K(18-crown-6)SiH(3)·THF] (1a) and [K(18-crown-6)SiH(3)·HSiPh(3)] (1b) confirm this conclusion, showing that small changes in the coordination sphere of the metal are sufficient to alter the orientation of the anion. A topological analysis of the calculated electron densities for 1 and 2 reveals that the K···Si interaction in the tet conformer of 2 possesses a significant amount of covalent character. In contrast, the inv form of 2 displays primarily electrostatic character for the K···Si and K···H interactions. Incorporation of the 18-crown-6 ligand in 1 reduces the polarizing power of the K(+) cation, hardening the cation-anion interaction in both conformers. The experimental structures of 1a and 1b bear out these conclusions, with the strongly bound tetrahydrofuran (THF) ligand softening the K(+) ion in 1a and favoring the tet conformer, while the weakly interacting HSiPh(3) ligand in 1b has minimal effect on the K(+) center, resulting in an inv orientation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".