Glove Tamponade for Atonic Postpartum Haemorrhage using Glove band
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Balloon tamponade is effective and recently included in armamentarium of management of PPH.Condom tamponade is also popular and widely used in low resource setting.We introduced in this study, tamponade with glove and glove band using the same principles.Methods: Tamponde with glove using both pneumatic and hydrostatic method was studied in 2 cases.Glove bands are used to tie the gloves to Ryles tube with stillette inside which was used for inflation and facilitate placement.The device appears similar to uterine thermal balloon.After inflation When tamponade test was positive, the vagina was packed and Ryles tube with stillete is folded and strapped at the introitus.Drainage channel was attached to glove end.Double glove was used in pneumatic tamponade.Stethoscope tubing was used as y-connector with dial pressure meter and BP apparatus inflator.Results: Hemostasis was achieved in all 2 cases.The device could be placed successfully and immediately after opening the prepared kit and there was no incidence of air or saline leak and no popping-out /prolapse or bursting of the glove.There were no complications or mortaliy.Conclusion: Hydrostatic tamponade needs longer time especially when double gloves are used.Single glove serves the purpose well.The action of pneumatic glove tamponade is effective and instantaneous.We recommend this when the blood loss is marked in atonic PPH and there is lack of time.The device is simple, cheap, made with easily available materials and can be safely applied.Glove band prevents leakage of saline as well as air effectively without occlusion of the ryles tube lumen.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".