A Novel Method of Normal Estimation for 3D Surface Reconstruction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A 3D object can be recovered from scanned point data, which requires accurate estimating normal directions of the object surface from the cloud data. Many point cloud processing algorithms rely on the accurate normal as input to generate an accurate 3D surface model. The neighborhood of a data point in its smooth region can be well approximated by a plane. However, the neighborhood of a feature point employed for the normal estimation is isotropic which would enclose points belonging to different surface patches across the sharp feature. In this paper, isotropic neighborhoods are segmented to search anisotropic neighborhoods for the accurate normal estimation. Normals and candidate feature points are first estimated by the principal component analysis (PCA) method. Neighborhoods of the feature point are then mapped into a Gaussian image. A k-means clustering algorithm is then used for the Gaussian image to identify an anisotropic sub-neighborhood for the data point. The normal of the candidate feature point is finally estimated by the anisotropic neighborhood with the PCA method. The proposed method can accurately estimate normal directions while preserving sharp features of the object surface. Applications have demonstrated the effectiveness of the proposed method.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".