MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2322194776 · doi:10.1016/j.juro.2016.02.2196

MP83-14 GENOMIC EXPRESSION EVIDENCE FOR ANDROGEN RECEPTOR AXIS ACTIVATION IN UROTHELIAL CARCINOMA: DATA FROM THE CANCER GENOME ATLAS

2016· article· en· W2322194776 on OpenAlexaff
Edwin E. Morales, Stephen B. Williams, Goodwin G. Jinesh, Debasish Sundi, C. Smith, David J. McConkey, Ashish M. Kamat

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Urology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institutes of Health Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAndrogen receptorCarcinogenesisBladder cancerAndrogenMedicineDihydrotestosteroneCancer researchCancerOncologyInternal medicineProstate cancerHormone

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

You have accessJournal of UrologyBladder Cancer: Basic Research & Pathophysiology IV1 Apr 2016MP83-14 GENOMIC EXPRESSION EVIDENCE FOR ANDROGEN RECEPTOR AXIS ACTIVATION IN UROTHELIAL CARCINOMA: DATA FROM THE CANCER GENOME ATLAS Edwin E. Morales, Stephen B. Williams, Jinesh G. Goodwin, Debasish Sundi, Carolyn L. Smith, David J. McConkey, and Ashish M. Kamat Edwin E. MoralesEdwin E. Morales More articles by this author , Stephen B. WilliamsStephen B. Williams More articles by this author , Jinesh G. GoodwinJinesh G. Goodwin More articles by this author , Debasish SundiDebasish Sundi More articles by this author , Carolyn L. SmithCarolyn L. Smith More articles by this author , David J. McConkeyDavid J. McConkey More articles by this author , and Ashish M. KamatAshish M. Kamat More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.02.2196AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Recent investigations have implicated the androgen receptor in the oncogenesis and progression of urothelial carcinoma. Current evidence exists that inhibition of dihydrotestosterone (DHT) production decreases the risk of bladder cancer by nearly a third in a large North American cancer screening cohort. The precise biological mechanism of DHT inhibition and reduced bladder carcinogenesis remains to be elucidated. We sought to analyze the bladder database of the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) for androgen gene signature enrichment, and for expression of downstream target genes of the androgen receptor using heat mapping and genome set enrichment analysis. METHODS The TCGA is a multicenter study that examined 11,000 patient tumors as well as normal tissues to generate a genetic atlas of 33 distinct cancer types. The bladder TCGA was queried for expression of androgen axis gene expression signatures using GENE-E software (Broad Institute, Cambridge MA). Using this data, gene expression patterns were analyzed and using hierarchical clustering, matched to existing TCGA basal and luminal tumor subtypes. RESULTS Expression of the 5-alpha reductase isozymes SRD5A1, 2, and 3 (the inhibitory target of finasteride) was confirmed using the 128 tumor TCGA database and clustered into basal and luminal TCGA subtypes, with Clusters 1 and 2 (luminal or “epithelial-like”) expressing SRD5A2 and 3 while basal and “p-53 like” tumors expressed the more typical prostatic SRD5A1. In addition, significant expression of steroidal pathway synthesis and androgen/estrogen axes genes were observed, again clustered by TCGA subtype. Validation of these preliminary findings are underway. CONCLUSIONS Gene expression data suggest that urothelial cancer of the bladder exhibits activation of androgen synthesis and androgen receptor cross-talk pathways along with expression of the enzyme 5-alpha reductase. Expression appears to segregate by TCGA subtype which may be important in future clinical trials for subtype-specific antitumor therapies. © 2016FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 195Issue 4SApril 2016Page: e1086 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2016MetricsAuthor Information Edwin E. Morales More articles by this author Stephen B. Williams More articles by this author Jinesh G. Goodwin More articles by this author Debasish Sundi More articles by this author Carolyn L. Smith More articles by this author David J. McConkey More articles by this author Ashish M. Kamat More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.124

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.008
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0370.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Urology→Same topicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments→French-language works237,207→