MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2322227787 · doi:10.1097/brs.0000000000000022

Sagittal Alignment of Spine and Pelvis in Asymptomatic Adults

2013· article· en· W2322227787 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSpine · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicScoliosis diagnosis and treatment
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePelvic tiltAsymptomaticLumbar lordosisPelvisProspective cohort studySagittal planeIncidence (geometry)CohortLumbarSurgeryAnatomyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, cross-sectional study. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the normal values of sagittal spinal and pelvic parameters in Chinese populations and to determine the influence of age, sex, weight, and ethnicity on variations of these parameters. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: A few studies have been conducted to evaluate the morphology and orientation of pelvis in asymptomatic adults of Caucasian populations. However, there is still a lack of investigation concerning the normal range of spinal and pelvic alignment in Asian populations. METHODS: A cohort of 260 asymptomatic adult volunteers from Chinese Han populations was prospectively recruited. The following 6 radiological parameters on lateral radiograph were evaluated for each subject, including sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence, thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, and C7 tilt. Comparisons of these parameters between the male and the female and between Chinese Han populations and Caucasian populations were carried out with Student t tests. The relationships between all parameters and age and weight were assessed using the Pearson correlation analysis. RESULTS: The mean values of spinopelvic parameters of the cohort were 44.6 ± 11.2° for pelvic incidence, 11.2 ± 7.8° for pelvic tilt, and 32.5 ± 6.5° for SS, respectively. With the age matched, subjects from Chinese populations were found to have significantly smaller pelvic incidence and SS than those from Caucasian populations. The females were found to have significantly higher lumbar lordosis than the males. Presenting significant but small correlations with age of both male and female adults, thoracic kyphosis and pelvic tilt tended to increase with age, whereas SS had a tendency to decrease with age. Weight was significantly correlated with thoracic kyphosis, SS, and lumbar lordosis. CONCLUSION: The normal values of sagittal spinal and pelvic parameters in Chinese populations could be significantly influenced by age, weight, and sex. Moreover, obvious variations of spinopelvic parameters were found between populations with different ethnicity background. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.069
Threshold uncertainty score0.356

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it