MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2322260433 · doi:10.1021/ic4028332

Red-Emitting [Ru(bpy)<sub>2</sub>(N-N)]<sup>2+</sup> Photosensitizers: Emission from a Ruthenium(II) to 2,2′-Bipyridine <sup>3</sup>MLCT State in the Presence of Neutral Ancillary “Super Donor” Ligands

2014· article· en· W2322260433 on OpenAlexaff
Amlan K. Pal, Samik Nag, Janaina G. Ferreira, Victor Brochery, Giuseppina La Ganga, A. Santoro, Scolastica Serroni, Sebastiano Campagna, Garry S. Hanan

Bibliographic record

VenueInorganic Chemistry · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMetal complexes synthesis and properties
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryRutheniumPyrazinePyridineDenticityLigand (biochemistry)BipyridineCrystallographyRedoxStereochemistryMedicinal chemistryCrystal structureInorganic chemistryCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The synthesis and characterization of a novel family of [Ru(II)(bpy)2(N-N)](PF6)2 (bpy = 2,2'-bypyridine) complexes are reported, where N-N = pyridine/pyrimidine/pyrazine functionalized in different positions with the electron-donating bicyclic hexahydropyrimidopyrimidine (hpp) unit. A series of bidentate ligands 1a-5a were synthesized in good to high yields (55-96%). The corresponding complexes 1b, 2b, and 5b were prepared in n-butanol, while complexes 3b and 4b were prepared in a mixture of n-butanol and water (1/1, v/v) in modest to good yields (23-76%). Both ligand and complex structures were fully characterized by a variety of techniques, including X-ray crystallography. In cyclic voltammetric studies, all the complexes exhibit a Ru(III/II) couple, which is ∼500 mV less positive than the Ru(III/II) couple in Ru(bpy)3(2+). The (1)MLCT and (3)MLCT states of all of the complexes (530-560 nm/732-745 nm) are shifted bathochromically in comparison to those of Ru(bpy)3(2+) (450 nm/620 nm). These values are in good agreement with DFT and TD-DFT calculations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInorganic ChemistrySame topicMetal complexes synthesis and propertiesFrench-language works237,207