MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2322277694 · doi:10.1021/ie3030533

Carbon Dioxide Adsorption on Amine-Impregnated Mesoporous SBA-15 Sorbents: Experimental and Kinetics Study

2013· article· en· W2322277694 on OpenAlexaff
An Zhao, Arunkumar Samanta, Partha Sarkar, Rajender Gupta

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCarbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
Canadian institutionsAlberta InnovatesUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdsorptionSorbentDesorptionMesoporous materialFlue gasChemistryAmine gas treatingMesoporous silicaChemical engineeringFourier transform infrared spectroscopyCarbon dioxideActivated carbonKineticsThermogravimetric analysisMoistureMaterials scienceOrganic chemistryCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work, an experimental and theoretical investigation was conducted on the adsorptive removal of CO 2 onto tetraethylenepentamine (TEPA) functionalized mesoporous SBA-15. The functionalization of SBA-15 silica with TEPA was achieved using a conventional wet impregnation technique. The structural properties of the mesoporous silica sorbents were characterized by nitrogen adsorption/desorption, SAXS, SEM, TEM, and FTIR techniques. The adsorption of CO 2 on the amine-impregnated sorbent was measured by thermogravimetric method over a CO 2 partial pressure range of 10–100 kPa and a temperature range of 30–100 °C under atmospheric pressure. The effects on CO 2 adsorption capacity of temperature, partial pressure of CO 2, amine loading, and moisture were evaluated. All the impregnated SBA-15 sorbents showed reversible CO 2 adsorption behaviors with fast adsorption kinetics. The CO 2 adsorption capacity measured at different temperatures suggests that the optimal adsorption temperature is 75 °C. The CO 2 uptake of the amine-impregnated sorbent increased significantly in the presence of moisture. SBA-15 containing 60 wt % TEPA showed the highest CO 2 adsorption capacity of 5.22 mmol/g in pure and humid CO 2 at 75 °C. Temperature swing adsorption/desorption cycles were also explored using simulated flue gas in both dry and humid conditions, and it was found that CO 2 uptake after ten cycles was within 90% of CO 2 uptake of the first cycle. Different adsorption kinetic models have also been investigated to analyze the experimental data of CO 2 uptake. The model was validated with the experimental results of isothermal adsorption measurements of CO 2 on SBA-15/TEPA. It has been found that Fractional Order kinetic model ( Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 173, 72) is very good over the entire adsorption region of the study with a maximum average absolute deviation between experimental CO 2 uptake and that calculated from the model of about 2.42%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations185
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry ResearchSame topicCarbon Dioxide Capture TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207