L’abri Sous les Rideaux à Lespugue (Haute-Garonne) et l’Âge du bronze dans les gorges de la Save
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The test excavation of the “ Abri Sous-les-Rideaux” (Lespugue, Haute-Garonne) disclosed occupation levels dating between the Middle Ages and the Late Neolithic-Chalcolithic periods. Our purpose is to study the ceramics. Occupation was intense during the different periods of the Bronze Age up to the Final Bronze Age, and continued during the Iron Age. The largest corpus seems however to have belonged to the Early and Middle Bronze Age. The previously unknown «plateau polypode » [ «polypod tray » ] could belong to this period. This corpus belongs to the Pyrenean Early-Middle Bronze Age, as shown by comparisons with pottery from Aquitaine or the piedmont up to the eastern Pyrenees and beyond. Moreover, some decorative similarities are possible with the Noyer group in Quercy. This study proposes the hypothesis of a crossing of influences during the Early and Middle Bronze Ages, along a north-south axis as well as east-west. Thus the populations of the Save gorges in the Pyrenean foothills would also have been in contact with the territories of the lower Garonne and Lot river valleys.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".