Mineral metabolism management in Canadian peritoneal dialysis patients
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Abnormal mineral metabolism is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in dialysis patients. Therefore, the goal of this study was to compare a) mineral metabolism control among a cohort of Canadian peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients to K/DOQI-defined targets and b) the effect of different treatment strategies on mineral metabolism parameters. METHODS: We looked at a cohort of 317 Canadian PD patients from 9 clinics that used the PhotoGraph™ software program which tracks mineral metabolism management. Serum phosphorus (P), calcium (Ca) and intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) values were collected for the patients. Data were categorized and analyzed by the type of phosphate binder prescribed, vitamin D use, and dosing and reimbursement criteria for the phosphate binder, sevelamer. RESULTS: The majority of patients achieved K/DOQI-set targets for serum P. Patients who resided in Quebec (QC), which had greater access to sevelamer, had lower mean concentrations of P and Ca, were less likely to take Ca-based phosphate binders (CBBs) exclusively and were exposed to less exogenous Ca than in Ontario (ON). CONCLUSION: Availability of the phosphate binder sevelamer and reduced doses of elemental Ca were associated with more mineral metabolism parameters within suggested target ranges. Further studies that focus on patient outcomes are warranted.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it