PSYCHOLOGICAL RISK FACTORS OF PSYCHOSOMATIC DISORDERS IN CHILDREN WITH IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective. To examine indicators of the alexithymia level in adoles- cents with idiopathic scoliosis. Material and Methods . The study included 110 adolescents aged 12 to 16 years. Out of them 30 children had idiopathic scoliosis, and 20 - grade III-IV dysplastic scoliosis. The control group con- sisted of 30 adolescents without severe chronic diseases, and 30 - with rheumatoid arthritis. The Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS) and the Emotional Intelligence (EQ) Test were used in the study. Results . Analysis of alexithymia severity levels in adolescent groups showed that high and middle levels of alexithymia prevailed in chil- dren with idiopathic scoliosis. Adolescents with psychosomatic dis- orders and idiopathic scoliosis had difficulties in identifying their own emotional experiences and related uncomfortable bodily sen- sations, including muscular tension. Conclusion . Adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis and their peers with psychosomatic disorders are characterized by greater sever- ity of alexithymic features as compared to their healthy peers and adolescents with dysplastic scoliosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".