Having in Mind: The Philosophy of Keith Donnelan, edited by Joseph Almog and Paolo Leonardi
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Journal Article Having in Mind: The Philosophy of Keith Donnelan , edited by Joseph Almog and Paolo Leonardi Get access Having in Mind: The Philosophy of Keith Donnelan , edited by Joseph Almog and Paolo Leonardi . New York : Oxford University Press , 2012 , pp. 208. H/b £55.00. Eros Corazza Eros Corazza ILCLI The University of the Basque Country UPV-EHU Donostia Spain IKERBASQUE Basque Foundation for Science Bilbao Spain Philosophy and Cognitive Sciences Carleton University Ottawa Canada eros_corazza@carleton.ca Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Mind, Volume 124, Issue 493, January 2015, Pages 305–312, https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzu162 Published: 29 January 2015
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it