La Vierge et la Santa Maria. Les sœurs MIC et la plasticité des religions chinoises à l’Hôpital Général chinois de Manille (1921-1939)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Originally from Canada and sent to the Philippines in 1921, the Missionary Sisters of the Immaculate Conception (MIC) were entrusted with the administration of the Chinese General Hospital in Manila. This mission put them in contact with many immigrants and residents from China. This paper examines the multiple challenges that the sisters met in dealing with a dying population they were trying to convert in the face of well established Buddhist and Taoist beliefs and practices. The sisters fought against these practices, turning the hospital where they worked into a place of ontological confrontation. Distributing medals and images of the Virgin Mary, the sisters also contributed to the plasticity of the existing Chinese religious traditions, especially the devotion to Santa Maria. The dedication of the sisters to care and education as well as their tolerance allowed them to develop lasting and profitable relationships with their patients. The Christianization of the Chinese nevertheless remained incomplete, their centuries-old traditions persisting. In the anthropological study of missions, this case study shows that misunderstandings often remain at the heart of the conversion process.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".