MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2322418826 · doi:10.1115/imece2009-12790

Design and Modelling of a MEMS Capacitive Temperature Sensor With Linear Capacitance-Temperature Response

2009· article· en· W2322418826 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammad Shavezipur, Chris T. Wong, Patricia Nieva, Amir Khajepour

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCapacitive sensingCapacitanceMaterials scienceLinearitySensitivity (control systems)Finite element methodTemperature measurementMicroelectromechanical systemsCompensation (psychology)ElectrodeFabricationActuatorElectronic engineeringOptoelectronicsElectrical engineeringEngineeringStructural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A capacitive temperature sensor with separate thermal actuation and capacitive readout is introduced. A bi-layer plate with fixed-free boundary condition is used for the thermal actuation to change the gap between two parallel electrodes used for capacitance measurement. Different coefficients of thermal expansion (CTE) of the two layers in actuator cause out-of-plane deformations in the plate when the temperature changes. The proposed design has the capability to control the response of the sensor by increasing its sensitivity in a given temperature range. To obtain the desired characteristic C-T curve, the design utilizes asymmetric geometries. Different design parameters such as the size of the bi-layer plate and the sense electrodes are considered as design variables. ANSYS® FEM simulations are used to extract the C-T responses of different geometries. The results of the FEM simulations show that for a given fabrication process and material properties, the design can be modified to provide the highest sensitivity and linearity in the C-T response for a given temperature range. This temperature sensor can be used for remote and on-chip temperature measurement or temperature compensation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced MEMS and NEMS TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207