PUBLICATION IN INTERNATIONAL JOURNALS: PERSPECTIVES FROM THE EXPERIENCE OF LEADERSHIP IN THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF ADDICTION MEDICINE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SESSION OVERVIEW Since its establishment in 1998, ISAM has focused on dissemination of recent research findings to the medical community, both in its annual conferences and its publication. Given the considerable expansion of both basic and clinical research in the addiction field in the recent years, it is important to members of the worldwide academic community to consider a variety of options for publication of their research findings. These include a number of journals and textbooks where this can be undertaken. In light of this, three key members of ISAM will be presenting perspectives on this field of academic activity based on roles they have played in relation to the editorial management of ISAM and related publications. This symposium will therefore provide attendees with useful background information on options for publication and a perspective on ISAM's role in this area of international scholarship. Gregory Bunt, M.D., the President-elect of ISAM, will review experiences in our organization with regard to this aspect of research dissemination. This will include the role of ISAM publications, with particular reference to the society's conference grant from the National Institute on Drug Abuse, of which he is Project Director, and research conducted in the therapeutic community program which he has directed, which has been presented in symposia at the ISAM annual meeting. Nady El-guebaly, M.D. edits, along with co-editors, Drs. Giuseppe Carra and Marc Galanter ISAM's “Textbook on Addiction Treatment: International Perspectives.” He will present a talk on, “Defining An International Perspective: Lessons from a Textbook,” describing the extensive contents in the upcoming textbook, also the opportunity it presents to bring together a remarkable group of international contributors in a collaborative venture. Marc Galanter, M.D., Founding Editor of ISAM's official Journal, “Substance Abuse,” is currently Senior Editor, focusing on international issues. He will describe the 34 year history of the development of this journal, the kinds of articles which have been published, and the relationship of the journal to ISAM.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.025 | 0.028 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.022 | 0.013 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.011 |
| Research integrity | 0.007 | 0.010 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".