MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract P4-09-09: Serum SDF-1: Biomarker of Bone Relapse in the NCIC MA.14 Adjuvant Breast Cancer Trial

2010· article· en· W2322513139 on OpenAlexaff
SM Ali, Adriana Aguilar‐Mahecha, J-AW Chapman, A. Lipton, Kim Leitzel, Kaushar Jahan, Saima Hassan, LE Shepherd, Lin Han, Wilson Cf, Kathleen I. Pritchard, MN Pollak, Mark Basik

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicConnective Tissue Growth Factor Research
Canadian institutionsHealth Sciences CentreJewish General HospitalSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineBreast cancerOsteopontinStromal cell-derived factor 1OncologyBone metastasisBone remodelingCancerEndocrinologyCXCR4ReceptorChemokine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Massague et al have shown that breast cancer cell line subpopulations with elevated bone metastatic activity overexpress chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4), interleukin 11 (IL11), osteopontin (OPN) and connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) (Cancer Cell 3:537, 2003). CXCR4 overexpression results in bone-homing and extravasation of tumor cells in bone. In MA.14, we found that serum β-CTx was associated with bone-only relapse while Basik et.al showed that higher serum stromal cell-derived factor 1 (SDF-1) (ligand for CXCR-4) levels were associated with worse overall event-free survival (EFS) (ASCO 2010). In this study, we examined concurrently the association of both β-CTx and serum SDF-1 with bone relapse. Methods: Serum β-CTx (Serum CrossLaps, Nordic Biosciences, Copenhagen, DN) was determined in pretreatment sera from 621 of 667 NCIC CTG MA.14 patients. SDF-1 (CXCL12) (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) levels were successfully determined in the 4 month post-treatment serum (SDF-1) for 508 (76%) of the patients. Trial stratification was by administration of adjuvant chemotherapy, axillary lymph node status, and ER and/or PR status. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was defined as the time from randomization to the time of recurrence of the primary disease. Adjusted and unadjusted Cox step-wise forward multivariate analyses were used to assess the effects of β-CTx, SDF-1, trial therapy and baseline patient characteristics on non-bone, all bone and bone-only RFS; a factor was added if p<=0.05. Results: Joint assessment of β-CTx and SDF-1 was possible for 493 (74%) of the 667 patients. Imbalances in who was, or was not, included in this subset led to the trial arm of Tamoxifen + Octreotide LAR having a significant longer unadjusted ITT non-bone RFS (p=0.03-0.06). There was shorter time to bone metastasis of any type with higher lymph node involvement (p=0.001), larger T (p=0.02), and higher log SDF-1 (p=0.03). Meanwhile, high categorical and continuous β-CTx was associated multivariately with shorter bone-only RFS (p=0.04 and 0.01, respectively); higher log SDF-1 was only associated with shorter bone-only RFS (p=0.02) when the number of strata were reduced to 2 categories per factor. Conclusions: Higher serum SDF-1 level may be associated with bone metastasis, although there is less evidence of its relevance in bone-only relapse than there is for the biomarker β-CTx. Serum SDF-1 deserves further study as a promising predictive factor of bone relapse in breast cancer. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-09-09.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.410
Teacher spread0.347 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicConnective Tissue Growth Factor ResearchFrench-language works237,207