MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2322529891 · doi:10.3899/jrheum.141022

Pancytopenia in a Patient with Psoriatic Arthritis Treated with Methotrexate and Concomitant Lithium

2015· letter· en· W2322529891 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Ajesh B. Maharaj, Vinod Chandran

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Rheumatology · 2015
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
Canadian institutionsToronto Western HospitalUniversity of Toronto
FundersUniversity of TorontoUniversiteit van Amsterdam
KeywordsMedicinePancytopeniaPsoriatic arthritisConcomitantMethotrexatePsoriasisInternal medicineArthritisRheumatologyGastroenterologyDermatologySurgeryBone marrow

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To the Editor: We report a case of pancytopenia in a patient with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) treated with methotrexate (MTX) and concomitant lithium. Our index patient was a 55-year-old white female who had PsA since age 28. She had arthritis mutilans. Her disease was well controlled while being treated with MTX 15 mg weekly together with folic acid 10 mg weekly for many years. She was not receiving any nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs because her arthritis was well controlled with disease-modifying agents. Both her psoriasis as well as the PsA were well managed with the above medication. She had been followed up regularly with liver function tests and complete blood count tests every 3 months with no toxicity from the MTX. In March of 2012, she presented to her general practitioner with symptoms suggesting bipolar disorder. Her general practitioner then commenced treatment with lithium 400 mg daily. Two months after the commencement of lithium, the patient presented with epistaxis … Address correspondence to Dr. A. Maharaj, Academic Medical Center, Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 1100 DD Amsterd, the Netherlands. E-mail: maharaja30{at}ukzn.ac.za

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0090.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Rheumatology→Same topicRheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies→French-language works237,207→