MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2322556147 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/nou258.26

IT-28 * VACCINATION AGAINST EPIDERMAL GROWTH FACTOR RECEPTOR VARIANT III IN GLIOBLASTOMA: THE RINDOPEPIMUT COMPASSIONATE USE EXPERIENCE

2014· article· en· W2322556147 on OpenAlexaff
Evangelia Razis, Gordana Vlahovic, Larry D. Recht, H. Wheeler, David A. Reardon, Paul G. Fisher, Scott Owen, Karen Nicholas, Elsa Paradise, Michael Yellin, Thomas A. Davis, Michael Weller, Roger Stupp, Andreas F. Hottinger

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTemozolomideMedicineBevacizumabInternal medicineOncologyEpidermal growth factor receptorProgressive diseaseGastroenterologyCancerRadiation therapyChemotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The tumor-specific epidermal growth factor receptor variant III mutation (EGFRvIII) is widely expressed in glioblastoma and thus represents an attractive target for immunotherapeutic approaches. The investigational vaccine rindopepimut is an EGFRvIII peptide sequence conjugated to keyhole limpet hemocyanin and is administered intradermally with GM-CSF. Previous single-arm studies of rindopepimut in newly diagnosed, resected, EGFRvIII+ glioblastoma have shown encouraging PFS and OS. This compassionate use program provided rindopepimut to 61 EGFRvIII+ glioblastoma patients who were ineligible for ongoing clinical trials. Data are currently available on 42 patients, 12 (29%) with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (resected or inoperable) and 30 (71%) with recurrent disease. MGMT methylation was seen in 9/17, while all tested patients were negative for IDH1 (12/12) and IDH2 (7/7). Median age was 53 years (15-70) and median time from diagnosis was 14.5 months (2.7-58.7). Rindopepimut, administered in combination with temozolomide (57%), bevacizumab (57%), and/or other (17%), was well tolerated, with frequent mild injection site reactions and one potentially treatment-related, serious event of cerebral edema. Median peak rindopepimut-induced anti-EGFRvIII titer was 1:1,200 (<1:100-1:6,553,600). Median treatment duration is currently 3.7 (0.03-60.1) months. Tumor response (>50% shrinkage in measurable disease) was observed in six patients receiving rindopepimut with other agents. One inoperable glioblastoma patient experienced a CR during treatment with rindopepimut, erlotinib, temozolomide, and bevacizumab, and has continued rindopepimut for >5 years without significant toxicity or disease recurrence. Biopsy at recurrence showed EGFRvIII was eliminated in a patient who received rindopepimut and temozolomide for ∼9 months. In patients with newly diagnosed and recurrent glioblastoma, respectively, median PFS was 9.1 and 2.5 months, and median OS was 15.7 and 8.7 months from first vaccination. In conclusion, rindopepimut in combination with various anticancer therapies resulted in robust anti-EGFRvIII humoral response with minimal toxicity. PFS and OS appear promising in this heterogeneous, poor prognosis population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-Oncology→Same topicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→