Congenital trigger thumb in children
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although numerous studies have been performed on congenital trigger thumb (CTT), the pathogenesis is still unknown. Cytocontractile proteins and myofibroblasts are present during soft-tissue contraction, and they may have a role in CTT. The aim of the study is to clarify the immunohistochemical and the electron microscopy characteristics of the first annular (A-1) pulley in CTT. The specimens from the A-1 pulleys were collected from 22 children with CTT. Electron microscopy was used to study the last five specimens. Immunohistochemistry staining demonstrated that all specimens stained positively for vimentin and for α-smooth muscle actin, and stained negatively for desmin. Electron microscopy showed fibroblasts in collagenous matrix, which contain vimentin-like material and associated at the surface with elastin-like tubular matrix filaments and elastin fibers. In two specimens, a few cells showed markers of myofibroblastic differentiation. The presence of the cytocontractile proteins and myofibroblasts suggests proliferation of fibrous tissues during either the intrauterine or extrauterine phase of development and may account for the presence of congenital stenosis at the level of the A-1 pulley. We believe that CTT may be developmental; if the process started in the intrauterine phase it might present as a fixed flexion contracture and will show mature fibroblasts. If the process started in the extrauterine phase, it might present as triggering first and will show myofibroblastic changes, then with the maturation of the fibrous tissue, result in a fixed flexion contracture.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".