MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2322629429 · doi:10.1097/shk.0b013e31824dcb5a

Specific Role of Neutrophil Inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase in Murine Sepsis-Induced Lung Injury In Vivo

2012· article· en· W2322629429 on OpenAlexaff
Lefeng Wang, Ravi Taneja, Habib Moshref Razavi, Cedrin Law, Chris Gillis, Sanjay Mehta

Bibliographic record

VenueShock · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory Support and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityLondon Health Sciences Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBronchoalveolar lavageMyeloperoxidaseNitric oxide synthaseNitric oxideImmunologyEvans BlueMedicineChemistryLungInflammationInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nitric oxide produced by inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) contributes importantly to acute lung injury (ALI), but the specific contribution of neutrophil iNOS has not been defined. Thus, we defined the role of neutrophils and specifically neutrophil iNOS in a murine model of septic ALI. Four hours after cecal ligation/perforation, ALI was characterized by increases in pulmonary neutrophil infiltration (tissue myeloperoxidase activity, bronchoalveolar lavage neutrophils), microvascular leak of Evans blue (EB) dye-labeled albumin, and oxidant stress (8-isoprostane levels). Septic ALI was neutrophil dependent, as pretreatment with anti-CD18 before cecal ligation/perforation significantly (P < 0.05) attenuated septic increases in pulmonary myeloperoxidase (39 ± 11 vs. 85 ± 14 mU/mg protein), bronchoalveolar lavage neutrophils (0.5% ± 0.2% vs. 2.1% ± 0.6%), microvascular EB-albumin leak (1.3 ± 0.3 vs. 2.6 ± 0.7 μg EB/g per minute), and 8-isoprostane content (74 ± 15 vs. 115 ± 16 pg/mg protein). The role of neutrophil iNOS was assessed by creation of neutrophil-iNOS chimeric mice: iNOS(+/+) versus iNOS(-/-) mice were bone marrow depleted by irradiation and selectively reconstituted with iNOS(+/+) versus iNOS(-/-) neutrophils. Cecal ligation/perforation resulted in significant septic ALI in + to - neutrophil-iNOS chimeric mice (iNOS(+/+) neutrophils in iNOS(-/-) mice), but not in - to + neutrophil depleted-reconstituted mice (iNOS(-/-) neutrophils in iNOS(+/+) mice). There were no significant differences between iNOS(+/+) and iNOS(-/-) neutrophils in phagocytosis, respiratory burst, or CD11a/b/CD18 surface expression, although septic shedding of CD62L was blunted in iNOS(-/-) neutrophils. Neutrophil iNOS contributes importantly to murine septic ALI in vivo, but not simply through a change in neutrophil phenotype. We speculate that neutrophil iNOS may modulate neutrophil-endothelial interactions in complex fashion, including regulation of transendothelial neutrophil migration and pulmonary neutrophil infiltration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations53
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueShockSame topicRespiratory Support and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207