MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2322639284 · doi:10.1021/am300362b

Degradation Mechanism of Benzodithiophene-Based Conjugated Polymers when Exposed to Light in Air

2012· article· en· W2322639284 on OpenAlexafffund
Salima Alem, Salem Wakim, Jianping Lu, Gilles P. Robertson, Jianfu Ding, Ye Tao

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOrganic Electronics and Photovoltaics
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Microstructural Sciences
FundersSustainable Development Technology Canada
KeywordsMaterials scienceConjugated systemPolymerDegradation (telecommunications)Mechanism (biology)PhotochemistryChemical engineeringComposite materialChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report the investigation of the air photostability of benzo[1,2-b:4,5-b']dithiophene (BDT) based conjugated polymers using UV-visible spectroscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, gel permeation chromatography, and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Three low band gap alternating D-A copolymers consisting of 3-fluoro-2-heptylcarbonylthieno[3,4-b]thiophene and alkyl-substituted BDT, alkoxy-substituted BDT, or dithienosilole, respectively, were prepared for investigating their photovoltaic performance and photostability. After only two hours of simultaneous exposure to light and air, the main absorption peak of the polymer films containing BDT units blue-shifted and its intensity dramatically decreased. We demonstrated that the BDT unit underwent dramatic structural change under illumination in air by reacting with the oxygen molecules at the excited state, leading to the disruption of the main-chain conjugation of the polymer. As a result, the color of the alkyl-BDT based polymer film permanently changed from deep blue to light yellow. In contrast, the dithienosilole based polymer was quite stable when treated under the same condition with negligible change in the absorption spectrum.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.888

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations97
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS Applied Materials & InterfacesSame topicOrganic Electronics and PhotovoltaicsFrench-language works237,207