Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy for Hydrocephalus Due to Tectal Glioma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tectal gliomas commonly present with hydrocephalus from obstruction of the aqueduct of Sylvius. The creation of a ventriculostomy in the floor of the third ventricle (ETV) has been previously reported to by-pass aqueduct obstruction. The goal of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of ETV in the presence of an obstructing tectal glioma. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical presentation, management, and clinical outcome after ETV in patients diagnosed with tectal glioma and obstructive hydrocephalus in our institution over a period of 15 years. Shunt freedom at follow-up was the main outcome variable. Long-term clinical outcome was assessed at the most recent clinic visit. Clinical outcome was ranked as excellent, good, or poor according to resolution of symptoms and patient functional status. RESULTS: The median age at presentation was 16.5 years (range: 6.4 to 59 years) and the most common presenting symptom was headache. Eleven patients had ETV as a primary procedure and three patients underwent ETV as a substitute for shunt revision at the time of shunt failure. At follow-up (median 3.9 years, range: 2.2 to 7 years) 13 of 14 patients remain shunt independent with excellent (n=9) or good outcomes (n=5). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with tectal glioma causing obstructive hydrocephalus, ETV can be performed safely in the primary setting or as a substitute for shunt revision. A high rate of shunt freedom (78%-100%) at prolonged follow-up can be expected in this patient population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".