MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Supersilent myocardial ischemia and risk of all-cause mortality in elderly patients

2013· article· en· W2322668324 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jesús Peteiro, F. J. Broullon Molanes, N. Alvarez Garcia, M. M. Garcia Guimaraes, Dalmer Ruiz, J. C. Yáñez Wonenburger, Beatriz Bouzas Zubeldía, R. Fabregas Casal, Alfonso Castro Beiras

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCardiologyChest painInternal medicineEjection fractionAnginaMyocardial infarctionCoronary artery diseaseDiabetes mellitusCanadian Cardiovascular SocietyIschemiaHeart failure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: Elderly patients have a higher prevalence of coronary artery disease but also a higher probability of abnormal perception of angina, and the Duke Treadmill Score failed to show significant prognostic value in these patients. The prevalence and clinical significance of echocardiographic evidence of myocardial ischemia in elderly patients with negative exercise electrocardiograms (i.e., supersilent myocardial ischemia [SSMI]) has not been investigated. Our aim was to evaluate the prevalence, predictors and outcome of SSMI, as assessed by exercise echocardiography, in elderly patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. Methods: SSMI was defined as the development of exercise-induced wall motion abnormalities in the absence of chest pain or ischemic electrocardiographic changes. A total of 1497 consecutive patients aged ≥65 years (50.8% males) with baseline interpretable electrocardiograms underwent treadmill exercise echocardiography and did not develop chest pain or ischemic electrocardiographic changes during the tests. The increase in wall motion score index from rest to peak exercise (ΔWMSI) was used as a quantifier of the degree of SSMI. The end-point was all-cause mortality. Results: SSMI was evident in 318 patients (20%). In logistic regression analysis, male sex (odds ratio [OR] 2.30, 95% CI 1.73-3.06, p <0.001), diabetes mellitus (OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.17-2.21, p = 0.004), prior myocardial infarction (OR 4.07, 95% CI 3.04-5.46, p <0.001), and resting left ventricular ejection fraction <55% (OR 1.44, IC 1.03-2.03, p = 0.036) remained predictors of SSMI in elderly patients. During an average follow-up of 4.3±3.2 years, 197 patients died. Five-year mortality rate was 16.9% in patients with SSMI vs 11% in those without SSMI (p=0.016). In Cox regression analysis, ΔWMSI remained an independent predictor of mortality (hazard ratio 2.58, 95% CI 1.07-6.23, p=0.03). Conclusions: A significant proportion of elderly patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease have echocardiographic evidence of SSMI in the absence of exercise-induced chest pain or ischemic electrocardiographic changes, which in turn identifies a subgroup of patients at a significantly higher risk of mortality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Heart Journal→Same topicCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias→French-language works237,207→