A stochastic power curve for wind turbines with reduced variability using conditional copula
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract It has been observed that a large variability exists between wind speed and wind power in real metrological conditions. To reduce this substantial variability, this study developed a stochastic wind turbine power curve by incorporating various exogenous factors. Four measurements, namely, wind azimuth, wind elevation, air density and solar radiation are chosen as exogenous influence factors. A recursive formula based on conditional copulas is used to capture the complex dependency structure between wind speed and wind power with reduced variability. A procedure of selecting a proper form for each factor and its corresponding copula models is given. Through a case study on the small wind turbine located in southeast of Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, we demonstrate that the variability can be reduced significantly by incorporating these influence factors. Wind turbine operators can apply the method reported in this study to construct a stochastic power curve for local wind farms and use it to achieve more accurate power forecasting and health condition monitoring of the turbine. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it