MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2322775875 · doi:10.1097/pcc.0b013e318271f475

Pharmacokinetic Characterization of Intravenous Cyclosporine Treatment for Cardioprotection During Resuscitation of Asphyxiated Newborn Piglets

2013· article· en· W2322775875 on OpenAlexafffund
Richdeep S. Gill, Dion R. Brocks, Thomas A. Churchill, Tze-Fun Lee, David L. Bigam, Po‐Yin Cheung

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric Critical Care Medicine · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTransplantation: Methods and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMedicinePharmacokineticsResuscitationBolus (digestion)AnesthesiaIntravenous bolusCardiopulmonary resuscitationPharmacologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: Cyclosporine treatment, as a single intravenous bolus, during resuscitation has been shown to attenuate myocardial injury in asphyxiated newborn piglets. However, the pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine treatment for cardioprotection in newborns has not been studied. We aimed to assess the pharmacokinetics of a single intravenous cyclosporine treatment during resuscitation of asphyxiated newborn piglets and compare these parameters with healthy newborn piglets. DESIGN: Newborn piglets were acutely instrumented and normocapnic alveolar hypoxia was induced for 2 hours followed by 4 hours of reoxygenation. Piglets were block-randomized to receive a single intravenous bolus of cyclosporine (2.5-25 mg/kg) (n = 8 per group). Eight piglets underwent no hypoxia-reoxygenation and received 10 mg/kg cyclosporine at the corresponding time point. Plasma cyclosporine and troponin concentrations during reoxygenation period were determined by high-pressure liquid chromatography and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, respectively. Noncompartmental methods were used to calculate the pharmacokinetic parameters. Cyclosporine concentrations and pharmacokinetic parameters were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance. SETTING: University animal laboratory. SUBJECTS: Piglets (1-4 days old, weighing 1.4-2.5 kg). INTERVENTIONS: Intravenous cyclosporine (2.5, 10, or 25 mg/kg) given during resuscitation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In the hypoxic-reoxygenated piglets, the plasma AUC(0-4 hrs) and C(max) of cyclosporine at reoxygenation were in the following rank order: 25 > 10 > 2.5 mg/kg treatment (p < 0.001 between groups, analysis of variance). Plasma AUC(0-4 hrs) and C(max) in piglets treated with cyclosporine at 25 mg/kg was associated with increased plasma troponin levels, a marker of myocardial injury, relative to piglets treated with 2.5 and 10 mg/kg. Asphyxiated newborn piglets had higher clearance and lower AUC(0-∞), but similar AUC(0-4 hrs), steady-state volume of distribution, and mean residence time compared with those of healthy newborn piglets. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to demonstrate the pharmacokinetics of intravenous cyclosporine treatment during resuscitation of asphyxiated newborn piglets, which did not appear to different from that of healthy piglets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePediatric Critical Care MedicineSame topicTransplantation: Methods and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207