MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2322825129 · doi:10.11154/pain.28.1

<b>Spinal cord injury pain syndrome in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy </b>

2013· article· en· W2322825129 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Shoji Yabuki, Shinichi Kikuchi, Shin‐ichi Konno

Bibliographic record

VenuePAIN RESEARCH · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineNeuropathic painAllodyniaMcGill Pain QuestionnaireHyperalgesiaAnesthesiaSpinal cordSpinal cord injuryPhysical therapySurgeryVisual analogue scaleNociceptionInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is a disease showing various symptoms such as numbness of upper and lower extremities, disturbed fine motor skills, and gait disturbance due to spinal cord compression. CSM causes high degree of ADL (activities of daily living) disturbance due to these symptoms. Some patients show allodynia or hyperalgesia in upper and lower extremities. However, neuropathic pain in patients with CSM has not been paid attention as much as pain following spinal cord injury. The purpose of the current study was to determine the incidence of severe allodynia or hyperalgesia in upper and lower extremities in patients with CSM, and to clarify the characteristics of these patients. This study was approved by our IRB. A questionnaire was sent to 317 patients with CSM who were surgically treated in our hospital during the past 20 years. Data from 139 cases were available for analysis. Subjects were divided into two groups: Severe Pain group (NRS (numerical rating scale) of allodynia or hyperalgesia in upper and lower extremities was 5 and more than 5) and Light Pain group (NRS was less than 5). Age, gender, QOL (EQ-5D and SF-36), JOACMEQ (myelopathy evaluation questionnaire), McGill Pain Score, and the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory were compared between these two groups. Non-parametric tests were used for statistical analysis. There were 57 cases (41%) in the Severe Pain group and 82 cases (59%) in the Light Pain group. There were no differences in age and gender between two groups. However, the EQ-5D was 0.560 ± 0.152 in the Severe Pain group and 0.698 ± 0.179 in the Light Pain group (p<0.001). On the SF-36, all 8 items showed lower scores in the Severe Pain group compared to the Light Pain group (p<0.005〜0.001). On the JOACMEQ, all 5 items showed worse scores in the Severe Pain group compared to the Light Pain group (p<0.05〜0.001). The McGill Pain Score was 8.10 ± 7.79 in the Severe Pain group and 2.47 ± 5.23 in the Light Pain group (p<0.001). The total score of the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory was 22.92 ± 23.72 in the Severe Pain group and 8.03 ± 14.10 in the Light Pain group (p<0.001). There were 41% of patients showing severe allodynia or hyperalgesia in upper and lower extremities in CSM. These patients showed lower QOL and severe myelopathy. We should pay attention to allodynia or hyperalgesia in upper and lower extremities in patients with CSM.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePAIN RESEARCHSame topicCervical and Thoracic MyelopathyFrench-language works237,207