MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2322887107 · doi:10.3749/canmin.50.6.1623

THE CORUNDUM + TOURMALINE NODULES RELATED TO HYDROTHERMAL ALTERATION OF SPODUMENE IN THE NANPING No. 31 PEGMATITE DYKE, FUJIAN PROVINCE, SOUTHEASTERN CHINA

2012· article· en· W2322887107 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Can Rao, R. C. Wang, A. C. Zhang, Huan Hu

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Mineralogist · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTourmalinePegmatiteGeologyGeochemistryCorundumSpodumeneChinaHydrothermal circulationMineralogyArchaeologyPaleontologyMaterials scienceMetallurgyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Nanping No. 31 pegmatite is a spodumene-subtype LCT granitic pegmatite in southeastern China. Spodumene mainly occurs as rock-forming mineral in the quartz – coarse albite – spodumene zone (zone III) and the quartz – spodumene – amblygonite zone (zone IV). Various alteration-induced phenomena were observed in spodumene. Spodumene in zone III is usually altered along its {110} cleavages to networks of albite + muscovite, resulting from a replacement of spodumene by an alkaline fluid, which likely begins by Na metasomatism. Extensive alteration of spodumene in zone IV to quartz and muscovite veinlets is related to replacement by K+- and H+-rich fluid. However, alteration by strongly acid fluids also affected spodumene, leading to formation of fine-grained white mica in zones III and IV. In this paper, we focus on the occurrence of nodules of corundum + tourmaline, which are typically restricted to the aggregates of white mica in zone IV. Fibrous corundum and radial tourmaline signify a hydrothermal origin. Their textural relationship with secondary muscovite suggest a close genetic relation with the latter. The corundum + tourmaline nodules arise by alteration of the secondary muscovite by late B-, Mg- and Fe-rich fluids.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.063
Threshold uncertainty score0.125

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian MineralogistSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207