MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2323043260 · doi:10.1021/ef402294v

Fe/Mg Silicate Mining Residues as Solid Oxygen Carriers for Chemical Looping Combustion of Torrefaction Volatiles

2014· article· en· W2323043260 on OpenAlexaff
A. Sarvaramini, Faı̈çal Larachi

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy & Fuels · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicChemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTorrefactionCarbonationCarbon dioxideChemistryCalcinationCombustionAerogelPulp and paper industryChemical engineeringPyrolysisMaterials scienceWaste managementOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Torrefaction of woody biomass is a thermal treatment often used to increase biomass energy density prior to its thermochemical conversion. The feasibility of integrated torrefaction, where the energy required for torrefaction is provided from the burning of its self-released volatiles, while the resulting carbon dioxide is subsequently captured in a permanent sink, is an original avenue, which was investigated in this study from the point of view of mining residue valorization. The use of abundant, cheap, and comminuted minerals as solid oxygen carriers for chemical looping combustion (CLC) and as carbon sinks for mineral carbonation in combination with torrefaction of woody biomass was studied. The mining residue consisted of iron-rich (17.3 wt %) post-nickel recovery chrysotile/lizardite silicate minerals. Air pre-calcination of the mineral at 700 °C helped boost the extra-framework iron fraction up to 66%, mainly in the form of hematite, as evidenced from Mössbauer spectroscopy. Such a calcined oxygen carrier was then tested in airless torrefaction–CLC tied configuration under gas recirculation over the temperature range of 500–700 °C to burn the volatiles released during the torrefaction of birch at 260–300 °C. Up to 96% of the carbon released from the torrefied birch as volatiles was converted in the CLC bed into CO 2, highlighting the ability of the residue for burning torrefaction volatiles. The residue was finally tested in a torrefaction–CLC–carbonation configuration under gas recirculation for burning the torrefaction volatiles and capturing the produced carbon dioxide for various torrefaction, CLC, and carbonation temperatures. Up to 20% of produced CO 2 was sequestrated using this concept at the optimal carbonation bed temperature of 50 °C.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.733

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy & FuelsSame topicChemical Looping and Thermochemical ProcessesFrench-language works237,207