MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Characterization of Wintertime Air Pollution Concentrations and Variability in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia

2010· article· en· W2323054504 on OpenAlexaff
Ryan W. Allen, Enkhjargal Gombojav, Barkhasragchaa Baldorj, Oyuntogos Lkhasuren, Ofer Amram, Craig R. Janes

Bibliographic record

VenueEpidemiology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceNephelometerParticulatesAir pollutionPollutionPollutantAtmospheric sciencesPopulationPhysical geographyGeographyEnvironmental healthGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

S-30C1-2 Background/Aims: Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia's capital city, has recently undergone dramatic population growth, which has led to substantial increases in air pollution emissions. Major sources include 3 coal-fired power plants, residential wood and coal burning, and vehicles, some of which still use leaded gasoline. Temperature inversions and the surrounding topography lead to high wintertime concentrations. Methods: We measured air pollution in late February and March, 2010 using 3 measurement platforms to characterize wintertime concentration patterns of relevant pollutants. Daily filter-based particulate matter (PM)2.5 and PM10 and continuous light scattering were measured at a fixed monitoring station to assess temporal variability, and data on PM10, PM2.5, NO2, and SO2 were obtained, where available, from government monitoring sites. To characterize spatial gradients in PM2.5, mobile monitoring was conducted on 3 consecutive evenings (approximately 20:00–23:00) by driving preselected routes in a vehicle equipped with a GPS and a portable nephelometer. Spatial patterns in NO2 and SO2 were assessed with passive Ogawa samplers at 39 locations across the city. Results: Daily concentrations measured at a centrally located government monitoring site were high for PM10 (138 ± 39 μg/m3), PM2.5 (93 ± 33 μg/m3), NO2 (61 ± 10 μg/m3), and SO2 (69 ± 21 μg/m3). Mobile monitoring indicated strong PM2.5 spatial gradients and the spatial patterns were consistent across evenings, with highest concentrations in poorer neighborhoods where residential coal and wood burning is common. The highest PM2.5 concentrations measured by continuous fixed monitors generally occurred at around 08:00–09:00 and 22:00–0:00, consistent with periods of home heating. Land use regression models will be used to interpolate between the 39 Ogawa NO2/SO2 monitoring sites. PM2.5 filter samples will be analyzed by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry to quantify elemental constituents and infer source contributions. Conclusion: This work demonstrates the use of current exposure assessment techniques in a developing city and will aid future epidemiologic studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.120
Threshold uncertainty score0.606

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEpidemiologySame topicAir Quality and Health ImpactsFrench-language works237,207