MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2323201906 · doi:10.2514/6.2010-1188

Analysis of an Embedded Blade Root Carrot Subject to Cold Weather Using a Finite Element Model

2010· article· en· W2323201906 on OpenAlexaffabout
Patricio Lillo, Curran Crawford

Bibliographic record

Venue48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicComposite Structure Analysis and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlade (archaeology)Finite element methodRoot (linguistics)Subject (documents)Computer scienceCold weatherStructural engineeringEngineeringMeteorologyPhysicsWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Canada has aggressive targets for introducing wind energy across the country, but also faces challenges in achieving these goals due to the harsh Canadian climate. One issue which has received little attention in other countries not experiencing these extremes is the behaviour of the composite blades in winter conditions. The scope of this work is to determine and analyze the stresses on the blade root during ultimate operational conditions on extreme cold temperatures. The paper opens with a quanti cation of the extremes of cold experienced in candidate wind turbine deployment locations. Then, the paper narrows its focus to a consideration of the stresses in the root of the blade, speci cally the embedded root carrots. Finite Element models of the root are proposed to properly simulate boundary conditions, applied loading and thermal stresses for a 1.5 MW wind turbine. Finally, it is shown that the root blade is strongly a ected for the thermal stresses caused by the mismatch and orthotrophy of the coe cients of thermal expansion of blade root constituents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace ExpositionSame topicComposite Structure Analysis and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207