MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2323248294

{beta}-delayed {alpha} emission of {sup 18}N: Broad J{sup {pi}}=1{sup -} states in the {sup 14}C +{alpha} system

2007· article· en· W2323248294 on OpenAlexaff
L. Buchmann, J. M. D’Auria, M. Dombsky, U. Giesen, K. P. Jackson, P. McNeely, J. Powell, Alexander Volya

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. C · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric Ozone and Climate
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaSimon Fraser UniversityUniversity of TorontoTRIUMF
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsAtomic physicsNuclear reactionAlpha decayParity (physics)Beta decayBranching fractionExcitationAlpha particleNuclear physics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The {beta}-delayed {alpha}-spectrum of {sup 18}N has been measured at the TISOL facility at TRIUMF resolving the structure of a broad {alpha}-particle distribution at {alpha}-energies of 1.5-5.5 MeV into several states that show a distinct interference pattern. R-matrix fits assuming a solely J{sup {pi}}=1{sup -} partial wave confirm this finding. The extrapolated low energy part of this structure constitutes the natural parity background in a possible experiment to observe the parity forbidden {alpha}-decay of the E{sub x}=6.880 MeV, J{sup {pi}}=0{sup -} state in {sup 18}O that is estimated from the fit to be 2x10{sup -8} of the intensity of the E{sub {alpha}}=1081 keV peak. In addition, the tails of the broad 1{sup -} states observed likely contribute to the astrophysical {sup 14}C ({alpha},{gamma}){sup 18}O reaction rate though the experimental information available is too incomplete to allow precise predictions. The {beta}-delayed {alpha}-spectrum of {sup 18}N also excludes complex {beta}-feeding amplitudes at a significant level. The states seen in the {beta}-delayed {alpha}-decay produce a pattern of approximately equally spaced 1{sup -} states in {sup 18}O consistent with J{sup {pi}}=1{sup -} states seen at the same and higher excitation energies of {sup 18}O.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.611
Threshold uncertainty score0.965

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. CSame topicAtmospheric Ozone and ClimateFrench-language works237,207