MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Improved Electronic Excitation Energies from Shape-Corrected Semilocal Kohn-Sham Potentials

2012· article· en· W2323295630 on OpenAlexaff
Alex P. Gaiduk, Dzmitry S. Firaha, Viktor N. Staroverov

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRydberg formulaKohn–Sham equationsPhysicsValence (chemistry)Atomic orbitalAtomic physicsDensity functional theoryExcitationAdiabatic processHybrid functionalTime-dependent density functional theoryHartreeOrbital-free density functional theoryCoulombElectronQuantum mechanicsIonization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose a general method for obtaining accurate valence and Rydberg excitation energies from standard density-functional approximations in adiabatic linear-response time-dependent density-functional theory. The method consists in modeling the sum of Hartree (Coulomb) and exchange-correlation potentials, v(HXC)(r), by the Hartree-exchange-correlation potential of the corresponding partially ionized system in which a fraction of electron charge (δ = 0.15 to 0.30, depending on the functional) is removed from the highest occupied Kohn-Sham orbital level. The model potential is less repulsive and closer to exact in valence and near asymptotic regions, so it yields more accurate Kohn-Sham orbitals and orbital eigenvalues. By applying this scheme to conventional local, semilocal, and hybrid density-functional approximations, we improve their accuracy for Rydberg excitations by almost an order of magnitude without sacrificing the already good performance for valence transitions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.396
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review LettersSame topicAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207