MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2323441550 · doi:10.1080/21567689.2016.1171023

Response to My Critics – On Seeming Right

2016· article· en· W2323441550 on OpenAlex
Knox Peden

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePolitics Religion & Ideology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical Philosophy and Ethics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAustralian Research Council
KeywordsAestheticsPhilosophyHistoryPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Notes1 See, inter alia, Julian Bourg, From Revolution to Ethics: May '68 and Contemporary French Thought (Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press, 2007).2 See 'To Get Rid of the Signified: An Interview with Jacques Bouveresse' in Peter Hallward and Knox Peden (eds) Concept and Form, Volume 2: Essays and Interviews on the Cahiers pour l'Analyse (London: Verso, 2012), pp. 245–258.3 Samuel Moyn, Origins of the Other: Emmanuel Levinas between Revelation and Ethics (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2005), pp. 21–56.4 See Knox Peden, 'Anti-Revolutionary Republicanism: Claude Lefort's Machiavelli', Radical Philosophy, 182 (2013), pp. 29–39.5 Bruce Baugh, 'Review of Spinoza Contra Phenomenology', Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews, 28 March 2015, http://ndpr.nd.edu/news/56579-spinoza-contra-phenomenology-french-rationalism-from-cavaills-to-deleuze/

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.749
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it