Bibliographic record
Abstract
Transitional justice (TJ) can be conceptualized as a set of eclectic approaches that are used to tackle systematic or widespread violations of human rights that typically occur during authoritarian rule and/or in times of war. While there is now a substantial literature on the approaches to TJ utilized by various countries to address massive rights abuses in their recent histories (Rwanda, South Africa, Yugoslavia, Chile, etc.), almost nothing has been written about the possibilities of applying similar models to Somalia. The Somali case is unusual because, unlike other cases where a robust state has assumed responsibility for overseeing the processes of TJ, Somalia suffered a complete state collapse followed by a protracted civil war that continues in various forms to the present day. At the same time, the need to rebuild the country’s institutions from the ground up offers unique opportunities for scholars and advocates of TJ: to gather empirical data on past human rights abuses; to survey Somali opinion on the most practical and acceptable modes of addressing those abuses; and to help guide planners and policy makers in assessing the potential costs and
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".