Aryl Amidine and Tertiary Amine Switchable Surfactants and Their Application in the Emulsion Polymerization of Methyl Methacrylate
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The switchability and bicarbonate formation of CO 2 triggered aryl amidine and tertiary amine switchable surfactants have been investigated. Despite the lower basicity of these compounds compared to alkylacetamidine switchable surfactants, it was found that amidinium and ammonium bicarbonates could be formed in sufficiently high enough concentrations to perform emulsion polymerization of methyl methacrylate and stabilize the resulting colloidal latexes. Particle sizes ranging from 80 to 470 nm were obtained, and the effects of surfactant concentration, surfactant basicity, initiator type, initiator concentration, and CO 2 pressure on particle size and ζ-potential have been examined. Destabilization of latexes is traditionally achieved by addition of salts, strong acids for anionically stabilized latexes, or alkalis for cationically stabilized latexes. However, with CO 2 -triggered switchable surfactants, only air and heat are required to destabilize the latex by removing CO 2 from the system and switching the active amidinium or ammonium bicarbonate surfactant to a surface inactive neutral compound. This process occurs much more rapidly in the case of these less basic aryl amidine and tertiary amine based surfactants compared to previously reported alkyl amidine surfactants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it